![Sea-Doo GTX Limited 300 vs. Yamaha FX Limited SVHO [Video]](https://www.jetdrift.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/sea-doo-gtx-limited-300-vs-vs-yamaha-fx-limited-svho.jpg)
Sea-Doo GTX Limited 300 vs. Yamaha FX Limited SVHO [Video]
The Yamaha FX Limited SVHO and the Sea-Doo GTX Limited 300 are competitor luxury/touring models from the two main PWC manufacturers. Both of them offer outstanding performance and comfort, but each has its advantages and disadvantages.
If you want to compare these machines head-to-head, you’ve come to the right place.
We at JetDrift have compiled all you need to know into this GTX Limited 300 vs. FX Limited SVHO comparison post!
Sea-Doo GTX Limited 300 vs. Yamaha FX Limited SVHO
By the Numbers
The entire Sea-Doo GTX family is built on the innovative ST-3 platform, and the flagship GTX Limited 300 is no exception.
In terms of specifications, this ski measures 135.9 inches in length, 49.4 inches in width, and 44.9 inches in height.
Compared to the GTX Limited 300, the FX Limited SVHO is 5 inches longer and .6 inches wider.
They are almost the same weight since the dry weight of the Yamaha is 877 pounds, which translates to a curb weight of 1003 pounds. The GTX Limited weighs 849 pounds dry, and 947 pounds when fully loaded.
Interestingly, each ski features an 18.5-gallon fuel tank.The storage capacity of the Yamaha is a remarkable 44.5 gallons, split into a roomy front storage, a regular glovebox, and an under-seat storage box.
In contrast, the GTX Limited 300 can only carry 26.1 gallons of cargo, but its easy-access center storage configuration compensates for its lower capacity!
Unlike standard PWC bow storage units, this 27-gallon storage compartment sits directly in front of the rider and can be reached without getting up from the saddle.
Both of these machines are designed with a roomy and comfortable saddle rated for three riders. Unlike the smaller Rec-Lite and Recreation models, they can actually comfortably carry three adult riders.Regarding engines, the GTX Limited 300 features a supercharged, 4-stroke, 1630cc, fuel-injected, Rotax triple rated at 300 HP. This engine is cooled by a closed-loop cooling system.
The power source of the FX Limited SVHO is a supercharged, 1812cc, fuel-injected, Yamaha SVHO marine engine rated at 250 HP.
Like any other Yamaha, this WaveRunner is designed with an industry-standard open-loop cooling system.
Features
Both the GTX and the FX Limited come with a wide range of innovative features as standard, including:
- Electric brake and reverse (iBR / RiDE)
- High-performance sponsons
- Front storage compartment
- Glovebox with waterproof phone storage
- LinQ / RecDeck connection cleats
- Throttle-by-wire
- Cruise control
- Riding modes
- No-wake mode
- Dual mirrors
- Tow hook
- Mooring cleats
- Reboarding step
- Deck mats
- Audio system
- USB port
- 12V outlet
- Variable trim system
- And more
The Sea-Doo-exclusive features that come standard on the GTX Limited 300 are as follows:
- iBR brake and reverse system
- BRP Premium Bluetooth audio system
- Panoramic 7.8” color LCD
- iDF
- Handle grips with palm rest
- Ergolock system
- Easy-access center storage
- Storage bin organizer
- OEM Sea-Doo cover
- LinQ connectivity
- RiDE brake and reverse system
- 7″ Connext Touchscreen Infotainment System
- Handlebars with integrated rope hooks
- LED glovebox lighting
- Cup holders
- Footwell drain system
- Under-seat storage box
- Rec Deck connectivity
- Accessory Tow Package
- Color-matched tube
- Tube inflator
- Tube holder
- 12-volt outlet
- Tow rope
- Two fenders
Performance and Handling
Both the Yamaha FX Limited SVHO and the GTX Limited 300 offer amazing handling and overall riding experience. However, the latter offers better stability thanks to its innovative ST3 platform.
On the other hand, don’t forget that the more stable the jet ski, the less nimble its handling.But you can’t expect overly playful behavior from either model. Let’s face it, these machines are large boat-like sit-down skis, which lack the lively attitude of vintage 2-strokes.
They are designed for maximum comfort and stability rather than great cornering abilities.
In terms of performance numbers, the Yamaha can go from 0-30 mph in 1.5-1.6 seconds and can reach 60 mph in about 5 seconds. Thanks to its more powerful engine, the GTX Limited 300 can outperform the FX Limited SVHO in straight-line acceleration with its 4-second 0-60 time.
The top speed of both skis is electronically limited to 67 mph, but with a small rider and light load, they can reach 68-70 mph on good days.
Based on our research, the FX Limited SVHO gets 3.2-3.5 MPG and 21 GPH at WOT, while it gets 7.5-8 MPG and 3.2-3.5 GPH at best cruising speed.
The fuel economy of the GTX Limited 300 is not available, but you can expect it to be in the same ballpark.
As a reference, its brother the RXT-X 300 gets about 2.5-3 MPG and 25 GPH at WOT, which moderates back to 6.5-7 MPG at the best cruising speed. Sure, this ski is tuned for performance, which means it burns slightly less fuel than the GTX.
GTX Limited 300 vs. FX Limited SVHO Comparison Chart
For your convenience, we’ve compiled the key specs of these skis into this GTX Limited 300 vs. FX Limited SVHO comparison chart:| Specs | FX Limited SVHO | GTX Limited 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Yamaha | Sea-Doo |
| Category | Luxury / Touring | Luxury / Touring |
| Displacement (cc) | 1812 | 1630 |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 |
| Supercharged | Yes | Yes |
| Brake & Reverse | Yes | Yes |
| HP | 250 | 300 |
| Length (in) | 140.9 | 135.9 |
| Width (in) | 50 | 49.4 |
| Dry Weight (lbs) | 877 | 849 |
| Curb Weight (lbs) | 1003 | 974 |
| Fuel Capacity (gal) | 18.5 | 18.5 |
| Storage Capacity (gal) | 44.5 | 26.1 |
| Weight Capacity (lbs) | na | 600 |
| Rider capacity | 3 | 3 |
Conclusion
As a takeaway, we’ve compiled the key pros and cons of each model under one roof:Pros of the Yamaha FX Limited SVHO:- Longer hull
- Larger storage capacity (44.5 vs. 26.1 gals.)
- Underseat storage box
- Smooth, larger displacement, 4-cylinder engine
- Accessory tow package
- Higher reliability
- Quicker acceleration (ca. 4 vs.5 sec. on the 0-60 mph)
- Better stability
- Easy-access front storage
- iDF debris-free system
- Lighter weight (849 vs. 877 lbs.)
- Better seat design (Ergolock system)
- More horsepower (300 vs. 250 HP)
- Closed-loop cooling system
But as a final word, you can’t go wrong with either of them!
