Compare Specs Discover '24 PWCs Browse Reviews
Sea-Doo RXT-X 300 vs. Yamaha FX Limited SVHO [Video]

Sea-Doo RXT-X 300 vs. Yamaha FX Limited SVHO [Video]

The Yamaha FX Limited SVHO is a luxury touring WaveRunner, while the Sea-Doo RXT-X 300 is more of a touring ski on steroids. Despite this, they often act as competitors in the marketplace.

If you want to compare these machines head-to-head, you’ve come to the right place.

We at JetDrift have compiled all you need to know into this RXT-X 300 vs. FX Limited SVHO comparison!

Sea-Doo RXT-X 300 vs. Yamaha FX Limited SVHO

By the Numbers

Although the Sea-Doo RXT-X 300 is classed as Performance PWC, it’s built on the extra wide and stable ST3 hull.

This platform is designed for touring models like those in the GTX family, but it has found its way into other PWC segments. Today, many great Sea-Doos enjoy an ST3 hull, and the RXT-X 300 is no exception.

In terms of specifications, this ski measures 135.9 inches in length, 49.4 inches in width, and 45.2 inches in height.

The Yamaha comes with a slightly larger hull measuring 140.9 inches in length and 50 inches in width.

Compared to the FX Limited SVHO, the RXT-X 300 is 48-pounds lighter, since its net weight is 829 pounds with a curb weight of 954 pounds.

You can expect the dry weight of the Yamaha to be 877 pounds, but it weighs 1003 pounds when fully loaded. For the best fuel range, both skis come with a large, 18.5-gallon fuel tank.

Even though the RXT-X 300 offers an overall storage space of 26.1 gallons, it includes an advanced easy-access center storage. This special design allows you to reach the storage compartment while sitting on the saddle, which makes life much easier on open waters!

In contrast, the FX Limited SVHO offers a total storage space of 44.5 gallons, which is split into a glovebox, an under-seat storage box, and standard bow storage. The latter offers limited availability since opening it while out on the water is virtually impossible.

Both skis come with a comfortable 2-piece saddle rated for three riders. Under the seat, you can find a high-performance, supercharged and intercooled, 4-stroke engine in each model.

To be more precise, the RXT-X 300 enjoys a supercharged, 4-stroke, 1630cc, fuel-injected, Rotax triple rated at 300 HP.

The power source of the FX Limited SVHO is a supercharged, 1812cc, fuel-injected, Yamaha SVHO marine engine rated at 250 HP.


Both the Sea-Doo and the Yamaha come with a wide range of innovative features as standard, including:


The Sea-Doo-exclusive features that come standard on the RXT-X 300 are as follows:

The Tech Package is also available for the RXT-X as an option, including the BRP Premium Bluetooth audio system, and the panoramic 7.8” color LCD with a Bluetooth smartphone connection.

In contrast, the unique features of the FX Limited SVHO include:

The FX Limited SVHO is marketed with the Accessory Tow Package, which includes:

  • Color-matched tube
  • Tube inflator
  • Tube holder
  • 12-volt outlet
  • Tow rope
  • Two fenders

Performance and Handling

Compared to the FX Limited SVHO, The RXT-X 300 has a more sporty attitude. This is no surprise, since the Yamaha is a true luxury jet ski designed for maximum comfort, while the competitor is a race-inspired Sea-Doo that inherited its hull from the touring segment.

Despite this, the RXT-X 300 proves to be more stable, thanks to its revolutionary ST3 hull, which delivers industry-leading stability.

This also means the Sea-Doo is more predictable but slightly less nimble and agile than its Japanese rival.

Powered by high-performance supercharged engines, both skis can instantly get on plane.

In terms of performance numbers, the FX Limited SVHO can go from 0-60 mph in about 5 seconds. Thanks to its more powerful, 300 HP engine, the RXT-X 300 can outperform the FX Limited SVHO in acceleration with a claimed 0-60 time of 3.5-3.7 seconds.

The top speed of both machines is limited to 67 mph by the factory, but with a light load, they can even hit 68-70 mph.

Regarding fuel economy, the Yamaha gets 3-3.5 MPG and about 20 GPH at WOT, while it gets 7-8 MPG and 3-3.5 GPH at best cruising speed.

In contrast, the RXT-X 300 gets about 2.5-2.8 MPG and 24-26 GPH at WOT, which moderates back to 6.5-7 MPG at the best cruising speed.

RXT-X 300 vs. FX Limited SVHO Comparison Chart

For your convenience, we’ve compiled the key specs of these skis into this RXT-X 300 vs. FX Limited SVHO comparison chart:
SpecsFX Limited SVHORXT-X 300
CategoryLuxury / TouringPerformance
Displacement (cc)18121630
Brake & ReverseYesYes
Length (in)140.9135.9
Width (in)5049.4
Dry Weight (lbs)877829
Curb Weight (lbs)1003954
Fuel Capacity (gal)18.518.5
Storage Capacity (gal)44.526.1
Weight Capacity (lbs)na600
Rider capacity33
This chart is for informational purposes only! For exact specifications, please refer to the factory manual.


The FX Limited SVHO is a purpose-built luxury/touring jet ski, while the RXT-X 300 is more of a touring ski with a performance accent. This means that the Yamaha is designed with maximum comfort and capacities in mind, while the Sea-Doo is intended for racers and more performance-minded riders.

Each of these skis has its pros and cons, which are as follows:Pros of the Yamaha FX Limited SVHO:

  • Longer hull
  • Larger storage capacity (44.5 vs. 26.1 gals.)
  • Underseat storage box
  • Smooth, larger displacement, 4-cylinder engine
  • Higher reliability
  • Accessory tow package
Pros of the Sea-Doo RXT-X 300:

If you are undecided between these skis, you may want to test ride both to discover the differences.

But as a final word, you can’t go wrong with either of them!